Applicability of indicator monitoring to ecological risk assessment

Although ecological risk assessment (ERA) and environmental monitoring would seem to be potentially complimentary activities, they have been disjunct in practice. This is because of differences in goals and products. Environmental monitoring determines status and trends in indicators to determine whether the environment is improving. ERA estimates effects of stressors on endpoint attributes to support decision making. Indicators are, by definition, indicative of some unmeasured condition. Assessment endpoints are valued properties of the environment that are susceptible to stressors of concern. Indicators are justified by the logic of the monitoring program, which may be self-referential. Assessment endpoints are justified by their potential susceptibility and by environmental policies and public values. Indicators are often expressed in terms of indices or scores that obscure the actual condition of the environment. Because assessment endpoints must be clear to decision makers and the public, they require real units of actual environmental properties. Monitoring programs are peripherally concerned about causal relationships, while risk assessment is devoted to elucidating causal relationships. As a result, risk assessments may use the results of monitoring studies, but only after disaggregating the indicators to their components and choosing those that are appropriate. Monitoring programs could be more useful if they used a risk-based approach to address important problems rather than simply tracking indicators.     

Repeated predatory attacks and multiple decisions to come out from a refuge in an alpine lizard

Prey often respond to predator presence by increasing theiruse of refuges. However, because the use of refuges may entailseveral costs, the decision of when to come out from a refugeshould be optimized. In some circumstances, if predators remainwaiting outside the refuge and try new attacks or if predator density increases, the prey may suffer successive repeated attacksin a short time. Successive attacks may represent an increasein the risk of predation, but the costs of refuge use alsomay increase with time spent in the refuge. Thus, prey shouldmake multiple related decisions on when to emerge from the refuge after each new attack. We simulated in the field repeatedpredatory attacks to the same individuals of the lizard Lacertamonticola and specifically examined the variation in successivetimes to emergence from a refuge under different thermal conditions(i.e., different costs of refuge use). The results showed thatrisk of predation but also thermal costs of refuge use affectedthe emergence decisions. Lizards increased progressively theduration of time spent in the refuge between successive emergencetimes when the costs of refuge use were lower, but tended tomaintain or to decrease the duration of time spent in the refugebetween successive emergence times when cost of refuge useincreased. Additionally, lizards that entered the refuge withhigher body temperatures had overall emergence times of longer duration. Optimization of refuge use and flexibility in theantipredator responses might help lizards to cope with increasedpredation risk without incurring excessive costs of refugeuse.     

Risk assessment for nonindigenous pests: 1. Mapping the outputs of phenology models to assess the likelihood of establishment

This paper demonstrates the use of phenology models mapped over the landscape as a tool in support of risk assessments for nonindigenous plant pests. Drawing on the relationship between pest development and temperature, the approach uses gridded sequential interpolated temperatures at a resolution of 1 km, linked with phenology models, to predict the potential for a pest to develop throughout the landscape. The potential for establishment of Colorado beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) in England and Wales was used as an illustration. The likelihood of the pest completing a single generation during a 30‐year period (1961–90) was computed. Summaries of phenology, based firstly upon point temperature series from weather stations and secondly upon temperatures interpolated across the landscape, were compared. The results revealed that the use of point data led to a 70% likelihood of over‐estimating the area at risk from year to year. In the case of average long‐term risk however, the point‐based and landscape‐wide distributions of establishment potential were similar. We demonstrate how the use of phenology models running on a daily time scale provides date based results, so allowing outputs to be tied in with periods in the cropping cycle. The application of daily data in computing the phenological results, unlike the main body of published work on pest risk assessment which uses averaged monthly data, reflects more fully the underlying variability and degrees of sensitivity of the pest to changes in weather.     

生物信息学辅助定位及延伸辐射诱导未知表达序列标签

研究辐射诱导的基因表达调控对于认识细胞对辐射损伤的应激反应有重要意义.在低剂量辐射诱导新基因RIG1表达序列标签(expression sequence tag,EST)片段的基础上,通过非克隆cDNA文库和RACE(rapid amplification of cDNA end)技术获得了其3′末端.依据实验得到的这两段EST序列所提供的信息,通过生物信息学分析将RIG1基因初步定位在20号染色体.对20号染色体RIG1区基因组序列进行外显子扫描,发现预测的外显子正好与实验得到的EST相吻合.利用预测的外显子设计特异引物,成功地克隆了RIG1基因全长序列.同时,对20号染色体RIG1区的生物信息学分析表明,在RIG1基因的上游存在启动子区,从而确定了RIG1基因的基因组序列.因此,通过生物信息学辅助设计实验,快捷地定位及延伸了未知EST片段RIG1,基本完成了RIG1的全基因、基因组序列及染色体定位研究.     

Relating Ozone Uptake in Forest Trees to Risk Assessment

This paper reviews the importance of ozone uptake through plant stomata in understanding plant response to ozone and discusses challenges in quantifying ozone uptake in forest trees. Uncertainties in spatial and temporal scaling of ozone uptake from the leaf to the landscape level, insufficient monitoring of ozone in forested areas, and tremendous variability in the composition and structure of forest ecosystems of the United States prevent the current use of ozone uptake in large-scale risk assessments and regulatory decisions.     

Machinery Risk Assessment for Risk Reduction

New avenues are reviewed and discussed for preventing industrial machine-related injury by means of realistic risk evaluation and reduction processes at the design and application stages of machinery development and use. U.S. guidelines and European standards on machinery risk assessment procedures are described. Applications of risk assessment for machine-related injury risk management and teaching machine-risk control are discussed.     

Determining Indicators of Exposure and Effects for Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs): An Introduction

Endocrine disruptors are characterized by their influence on animal endocrine systems resulting in reproductive, developmental, neurological, and immune dysfunction. The purpose of this overview is to provide the reader with a sense of the activities within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), in particular NHEERL, that address the many facets of research on endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and to highlight the approach being taken at the different organizational levels within the USEPA, including screening, testing and evaluating endocrine disrupting chemicals. As a part of this endeavor, the USEPA continues to evaluate the current research activities in order to better understand and refine the process of risk characterization of EDCs. Thus, the participants in this session were asked to review their research within the framework of a better identification of EDC effects, better characterization of those compounds that have endocrine disrupting activity and how to incorporate this information into the risk assessment paradigm. Specifically, the goals of the ensuing papers were to compare individual vs. population indicators of endocrine disrupting effects, examine comparable and multiple mechanisms of toxicity, and describe the use of effects as indicators to identify toxicants and their sources. Mammalian and fish reproductive endpoints served as models to emphasize commonalities between human and wildlife risks.     

U.S. EPA Reference Dose/Reference Concentration Methodology: Update on a Review of the Process

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has been reviewing several approaches to testing and risk assessment related to implementation of the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) and the Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), both signed into law in 1996. Based on recommendations from a review of issues related to children's health protection under these laws, the USEPA established the RfD Technical Panel to evaluate in depth the current reference dose (RfD) and reference concentration (RfC) process in general, and in particular with respect to how well children and other potentially sensitive subpopulations are protected. The RfD Technical Panel also was asked to consider scientific issues that have become of greater concern in RfD and RfC derivation (e.g., neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity), and to raise issues that should be explored or developed further for application in the RfD/RfC process. This paper provides the current status of the activities of the RfD Technical Panel. The Technical Panel has recommended that acute, short- term, and intermediate reference values should be set for chemicals, where possible, and that these values should be incorporated into the USEPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Database. A review of current testing procedures is underway, including the endpoints assessed, life stages covered by exposure and outcome evaluation, and information that can be derived from current protocols on various durations of exposure. Data gaps identified for risk assessment include the types of pharmacokinetic data that should be collected, especially for developmental toxicity studies, the impact of aging on toxic responses occurring after early exposure as well as concomitant with exposure in old age, and information available on latency to response. The implications of the RfD Technical Panel's recommendations for various uncertainty factors are also being explored.     

Quality by design approach for viral clearance by protein a chromatography

Protein A chromatography is widely used as a capture step in monoclonal antibody (mAb) purification processes. Antibodies and Fc fusion proteins can be efficiently purified from the majority of other complex components in harvested cell culture fluid (HCCF). Protein A chromatography is also capable of removing modest levels of viruses and is often validated for viral clearance. Historical data mining of Genentech and FDA/CDER databases systematically evaluated the removal of model viruses by Protein A chromatography. First, we found that for each model virus, removal by Protein A chromatography varies significantly across mAbs, while remains consistent within a specific mAb product, even across the acceptable ranges of the process parameters. In addition, our analysis revealed a correlation between retrovirus and parvovirus removal, with retrovirus data generally possessing a greater clearance factor. Finally, we describe a multivariate approach used to evaluate process parameter impacts on viral clearance, based on the levels of retrovirus‐like particles (RVLP) present among process characterization study samples. It was shown that RVLP removal by Protein A is robust, that is, parameter effects were not observed across the ranges tested. Robustness of RVLP removal by Protein A also correlates with that for other model viruses such as X‐MuLV, MMV, and SV40. The data supports that evaluating RVLP removal using process characterization study samples can establish multivariate acceptable ranges for virus removal by the protein A step for QbD. By measuring RVLP instead of a model retrovirus, it may alleviate some of the technical and economic challenges associated with performing large, design‐of‐experiment (DoE)—type virus spiking studies. This approach could also serve to provide useful insight when designing strategies to ensure viral safety in the manufacturing of a biopharmaceutical product. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2014;111: 95–103. © 2013 The Authors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.